![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Planning an orchestral program is like preparing a gourmet meal. It isn’t enough to present three or four pieces which are each beautifully prepared if they do not also have balanced qualities that heighten our awareness of what makes each piece distinctive. Unfortunately, relying on a stock formula like “Shakespeare and Music” is no guarantee for success; a “theme” is not the same as a balanced program. Coming up with aesthetically balanced programs is an imperfect science, and a program that one musician might find compelling may leave another, equally sensitive musician dissatisfied. Nonetheless, crafting programs is a challenge that I find particularly interesting. Depending on the circumstances, additional constraints may make the task even trickier – for instance, budget constraints may limit the orchestra to only two bassoonists, or the soloist may have chosen a concerto which present unique problems. When putting programs together, I ask myself, What are the elements of each piece that I most want to bring out? Will I be interested in the similarities between pieces that come from different times or countries? Or will the program focus more on the differences between pieces that, superficially, might appear to belong in the same rough category? Does any piece on the program make particular demands on the listener, and if so, how will the listener’s experience be enhanced by the music that immediately precedes or follows the demanding one? If one of the composers looks both forward and backward – Prokofiev, let’s say – which perspective do I want the program to emphasize? How about the tonalities of the pieces involved – is there something to be gained by giving the entire program a large-scale tonal plan? There is a lot of good music out there. Playing Dvořák’s Eighth Symphony instead of his Sixth might offer a certain convenience, since the Eighth will be very familiar to most orchestras and many audience members. But if the Sixth, which is a bit more motivic and animated, as well as more consistently in the major mode, fits the program better, why not play it instead? Click here to see some of the programs I’ve conducted that I think were particularly successful from this perspective. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||